Tuesday, October 9, 2007

The Guest Critter speaks!

Alright ladies....

Your friendly neighborhood critter is finally showing his face! :)
I have been carefully observing... taking time to consider my responses...

And... I should note that for many of you I have no prior point of reference for your work. I have only seen a couple of Jamie's and Libby's works before this, so I was sort of waiting to see a little of what you had to say about each other before jumping in without a compass.

So here we go...


Jaime...

First off... Bravo! ...on the crazy-obsessive time consuming process front.
I mean that as a compliment! It is a testament of your commitment to the work!

The swarm (such a great word... swarm!).... a writhing mass moving, not aimlessly, but with direction... Lots of tensions!!... Are they chasing the lead?? Or has the lead been forced out ahead of the pack, a sacrificial avante garde pushed forward to explore new territory?? ... the light paper plane is covered in heavily grounded house paint... free forward movement tethered by threads... suggested motion arrested and frozen... weightless flight weighed down by heavy mass... And perhaps... the implied future to come contrasted to a history traced in thread...


Even the title is full of tension!!
An urgent cry for escape and relief followed by a staid statement fact... or a play on two states of being ("The plane is..."): "...on fire" - full of action and change; "...paper" - a still and stable nature... I like tensions; they provide endless hours of contemplation! ;)

However...

Among these tensions, the weight and the stillness usually wins out... I like exploring these tensions, and to really hold you there I think it could have been even better... In this regard, I agree with Sydney that "the front half (flying upwards) is much more successful than the portion piling on the ground." I, like Sydney, also have the feeling that the upward momentum could have worked all the way from the ground up "if the planes were pooling more on the ground, spilling out and then forming into the object." I think this would help hold me in these tensions for longer, instead I feel resolved on the weight too quickly.

And lastly...

What genius of a photographer took your photos?

Cause all I gotta say is... DAMN HE'S GOOD! ;)



Libby...

I have been continuously impressed with your innovative use of materials! And specifically using them in a way that is very sensuous. The constructions do not necessarily appear to be particularly delicate, but they almost seem to possess life; accordingly, I want to handle them delicately for fear that I may hurt them and somehow they may feel the pain!

I felt this previously with your heart and hand pieces, and I feel it again with the piece that Sydney called the "caterpillar." It feels so organic as to possibly be alive! I think a whole community of these caterpillars could be super interesting! Perhaps they could inhabit and interact with the pods that you have discussed making! (Which by the way I think you should definitely make them! You've tackled human life and "caterpillar" life so effectively, why not tackle plant life next!) The one item of this "caterpillar" that I don't really like is the tinselly pipe cleaner at the top. It ruptures the soft organic quality of the rest of the piece... that kinda bugs me. :/

As for the other piece...

I'm not so sure that I'm diggin' it... Certain elements of it are nice... the sewn paper has a nice quality to it, and the color relationships of the oranges vs. the paper feels nice, but somehow the rest of it fails to capture me... maybe it just feels unfinished, maybe it could be a part of some bigger whole like Sydney suggested... I'm not sure...

On the whole question of abstract vs. "realistic" objects... I think your skill is in "lifelike"... whether they be abstract or "realistic" is perhaps inconsequential... for example the "caterpillar" is not exactly a realistic representation, and yet we cannot help but relate to it as though it has some life quality, and I long to either interact with it myself, or to observe it interacting with others of its kind... This reminds me of the Surrealist painter Yves Tanguy, his paintings are generally viewed as "landscapes" of a sort that are populated by "figures" but neither the landscape nor the figures have any recognizable "realistic" representation, they are all abstract forms but they seem to possess a lifelike quality and they seem to interact with one another and with their environment in ways that we can identify with. You could perhaps create the same types of "figures" and "environments" of sculpture. Abstract, but lifelike!



Sydney...

The great variety of materials and surface treatments is really interesting overall... but generally... I like the pieces from your "1a" posting better than "1b"... I think that 1b feels very disorganized... the colors are nice, and the surface is really interesting to explore (looking at the larger resolution photos and detail image I liked it much better than the small representation), but all in all I don't sense much of a movement in the piece it kinda feels haphazard (at least to me).

On the other hand... I love the sense of movement and connectedness among the forms you posted in 1a! These are much more engaging for me... they still have the same variety in surface texture and treatment, but with much more organized forms... I love it! :)



Elly...

Regarding the self-portrait... Libby put it best when she said "the 'self study' didn't surprise me when I first saw it (save for my continual awe at your sheer talent woman! You can draw!)." Damn girl! You got skillz! Not a real ground breaking sketch in my estimation, but executed excellently! To engage with some of the comments others made about it... Sydney mentioned your giving the figure a lot of room on the page, and Libby talked about the highlights on the face (her comment was desirous of more depth in the face)... I think that the space around the figure and the bright highlights on her face contribute to a very isolated feeling... I think this works well, and it leads me to interpret the stern expression as the focus of perseverance in the face of opposition (after all, judging by the interrogation light you are enduring, it is some other force that has isolated you). In this context I read the doll as a source of comfort for you as you are bracing against exposure of some sort, but of course I know nothing of the history with the doll that Libby alluded to, so I could be way off. All in all... I like it.

But I like Pink Line even more!! YAY!!! I love the structural organization, the repetition of forms, though often these repeated shapes hold a slightly different relationship to other forms in each occurrence. Do the forms on the left represent the same figures multiple times, or are they each representing a different set of figures, what is the relation of the figures (it seems very familiar, or rather familial)?? ... and what about the forms on the right?? ... are they floor plans?? ... different possibilities for the same space?? ... maybe one massive interconnected space?? ... or maybe not even floor plans, but a mechanical schematic representing a machine of sorts... and under this mechanical interpretation, are the figures to the left the product of this machine??


It reminds me of mechanized production (perhaps relating it to familial production/reproduction), or maybe the corrupt nature of memory (altering slightly at each remembrance). Maybe you have created a memory machine that plays off of both these ideas?! In any case... there are systems at work here... relational systems, spatial systems, mechanized systems... oh my! ... we could explore for hours! YAY!!


There we go... That's my 2 bits... I hope you like it!


Thanks for inviting me to participate!


Jeff.

p.s. - Please feel free to disagree or comment on my comments!
I don't like to make declarations, I much prefer 2 way discussions! :)

2 comments:

J.R. Uretsky said...

I know I have been rather quiet in regards to the crits….but I have had a really difficult time with all of your work. But inspired by several conversations I have had with all of you (Jeff included), a recent bout of depression, and this glass of wine I think I may be ready to toss some of my thoughts into the vast, webby construct that is the internet.

I would like to start out by congratulating myself for getting such an awesome critter (and photographer...and um on that note a realized that I probably should have compensated you considerably more then a mere sandwich…damn, sorry.) But isn’t Jeff magic!?

Thank you Jeff.

Anyhoo, I have decided to crit your work by way of Haiku. If in anyway you find this unsatisfactory blame Sydney, for her little personally book claims that an INTP might not be effective writers. Poppycock.

Syd:
2 of 1 a: yes
Painting with objects, bravo!
Objectify: paint.

Eleanor:
Jeff says damn, and I
Going good, keep on trekkin’
Memory objects.

Libby:
You know I like these
Move back to Los Angeles
Pods: yes. Abstract: YES!


Lastly, I would just like to say that I recently had a conversation with Dan Callis in which I will attempt to quote verbatim…(well parts of…kind of)…
In regards to being successful artists in the future…i.e. being that 0.1 or 0.5 percent or whatever the hell it is Dan said…
“Sydney just walks up to them…” Dan extends his hand as if to shake and I, not really knowing what to do push myself back in the chair, “..she puts herself out there and makes it happen.”
He continues…
“and Elly gets on that damn plane to NYC when others wouldn’t…” I, full of jealously and selfishness soon begin to wonder if Dan will make an example out of me. Dan being all kindness and intuition picks up on this, strokes my pride down to a listening state and then continues…
“And I think of Libby and Lauren…” we both get distracted, and begin to preach to each other on the effectiveness of Kayo’s teaching methods. Then we both realized that we were in cahoots about the whole thing and spent several minutes bagging on all the sad, unfortunate, assholes that ‘just don’t get it’.
“…and that is what makes me think Libby and Lauren, both making graduate level work.…” (…some other stuff I can’t remember) “and Lauren a damn good abstract painter!”

…oh…umm…eh…”and the Jeff what a snazzy dresser!” (that’s me, not Dan...sorry)

So, I’ll leave you all with that account as well as the words of our dear friend quoting another friend (L’Engle & Chekov):

“You must once and for all give up being worried about successes and failures. Don’t let that concern you. It’s your duty to go on working steadily day by day, quite quietly, to be prepared for mistakes, which are inevitable, and for failures.”

I read this and thought of all of you. Libby with her keen and nimble fingers, Lauren with her satchel full of brilliance and cleaver words, Eleanor with all that insight and inquisitiveness communicated through pursed lips and wave like hand motions. And Sydney, who’s more of an all inspiring artistic/ creative force then anything else. All of you perfect in your imperfections and making work that is leaps and bounds in front of your peers. I am very glad to have all of you.

Libby said...

Thank you Jeff for such wonderfully thought out comments. You are such a valuable insight for us and I'm full of excitement at the prospect of moving forward from here, knowing that we have access to other artists who we respect and value. And how amazing is this here blog? I'm glad to be making an effort to continue to learn and grow and encourage my dearest friends (especially as I am so far away).

So thank you again Jeff.

And Jamie, you are awesome and I love you. I'll be there before you know it.